Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.

Scientific name record
Names_Plants record source
This is a synonym
This record has collections
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Hook.f.
Hook.f.
1867
735
ICN
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
species
Cyathodes pumila

Click to collapse Classification Info

pumila

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.

Prostrate shrub forming dense patches up to c. 4 dm. diam; branches ∞, ascending at tips; branchlets ascending. Lvs close-set, imbricate. erect, coriac., subsessile, glab., paler below; 3-5 × 1-2 mm., narrow-oblong to narrow-elliptic, us. minutely apiculate; margins ± thickened towards base. Fls minute, solitary, axillary and/or terminal. bracts ∞, investing peduncle. Calyx-lobes broad-oblong, obtuse, ciliolate. Corolla-tube cylindric, much > calyx; lobes acute, densely hairy on upper surface. Style minutely 5-lobed. Fr. dark, c. 4-5 mm. diam., globose; locules us. 5.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
Styphelia minuta Sleumer
Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.

Click to collapse Collections Info

Cyathodes pumila Hook.f.
New Zealand
Nelson Land District

Click to collapse Notes Info

editorial
On pp. 586–588 Quinn et al. 2003 (Aust. Syst. Bot. 16, 581–594) discuss the relationship between Cyathodes pumila of New Zealand and C. dealbata of Tasmania. Using molecular evidence they state "This suggests the two populations may well be conspecific, although detailed morphological study is still required...". As mentioned by Quinn et al. 2003, both taxa were excluded from Cyathodes sens. str. by Weiller 1996 (Aust. Syst. Bot. 9, 491–507) but have not been included within any of the segregate genera. This is supported by the molecular analyses of Quinn et al. 2003, where they emerged distant to Cyathodes sens. str. and sister to Monotoca. However, Quinn et al. (2003) concluded that the morphological features separated them from Monotoca also.

Click to collapse Metadata Info

1fe172cb-54e0-4e5b-a7fc-9af70c4da5c4
scientific name
Names_Plants
1 January 2000
27 March 2012
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top