Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
Is NZ relevant
This is the current name
This record has collections
This record has descriptions
This is indigenous
Threat status: Data deficient
Show more

Click to collapse Details Info

Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw., Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 36 121 (1953)
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953

Click to collapse Biostatus Info

Indigenous, non-endemic
Present
New Zealand
Political Region
Biome=Freshwater; The NZ Taxon is closely related. [JAC]

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Beverw.
Beverw.
1953
121
as 'floriforme'
ICN
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
species
Spirosphaera floriformis

Click to collapse Classification Info

floriformis

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953

MID CANTERBURY: Christchurch Botanical Garden, dead leaf of Nothofagus fusca, J. A. Cooper 8275, 9 Oct 2001; Kowai Bush, dead wood of Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides, 8 Apr 2001, PDD 80812; Caton’s Bay, dead petiole of Salix fragilis, 12 Sep 2001, PDD 74781.
Propagules globose, hyaline at first then grey-brown, 100–180 µm diam. Cortex cells 6–10 × 4–5 µm.
This species has previously been recorded in New Zealand but a note is appropriate. It is difficult to distinguish between the genera Clathrosporium and Spirosphaera without careful observation. Clathrosporium is distinguished by bilateral branching of conidium filaments resulting in a complex conidium that has a tendency to disarticulate on compression and is generally dematiaceous and has macronematous conidiophores (Hennebert 1998). Spirosphaera is characterised by unilateral branching (except S. lignicola), which is difficult to distinguish without specimens showing a complete range of conidium development. However, this generally results in a conidium with obvious spiral elements, and the conidia are generally hyaline, micronematous, and not disarticulating (except S. beverwijkiana Hennebert; see Abdullah et al. (1986)). The type of S. floriformis (the type of the genus) has not been examined. However, the original description and illustration by van Beverwijk (1952) indicate many spiral filaments and this feature is not clearly present in some later descriptions that show a similarity to Clathrosporium, e.g., Hennebert (1968), Abdullah et al. (1997), Matsushima (1996). The specimens reported here agree with these later descriptions of S. floriformis.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. (1953)
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. (1953)
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. (1953)
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw.
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. (1953)

Click to collapse Collections Info

Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
Australia
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
New Zealand
Auckland
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
New Zealand
Buller
Spirosphaera floriformis Beverw. 1953
New Zealand
Mid Canterbury

Click to collapse Metadata Info

1cb1a50a-36b9-11d5-9548-00d0592d548c
scientific name
Names_Fungi
1 January 2001
29 January 2002
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top