Cupressus L.
Details
Cupressus L., Sp. Pl. 1002-1003 (1753)
Cupressus L.
Nomenclature
L.
L.
1753
1002-1003
ICN
Cupressus L.
genus
Cupressus
Classification
Subordinates
- Cupressus ×leylandii
- Cupressus abramsiana
- Cupressus arizonica
- Cupressus bakeri
- Cupressus benthamii
- Cupressus cashmeriana
- Cupressus chengiana
- Cupressus columnaris
- Cupressus disticha
- Cupressus duclouxiana
- Cupressus fallax
- Cupressus forbesii
- Cupressus funebris
- Cupressus goveniana
- Cupressus guadalupensis
- Cupressus himalaica
- Cupressus horizontalis
- Cupressus japonica
- Cupressus lawsoniana
- Cupressus lindleyi
- Cupressus lusitanica
- Cupressus macnabiana
- Cupressus macrocarpa
- Cupressus nevadensis
- Cupressus nootkatensis
- Cupressus patula
- Cupressus pigmaea
- Cupressus sargentii
- Cupressus sempervirens
- Cupressus torulosa
Vernacular names
Associations
Descriptions
Cupressus L.
Monoecious trees, occasionally shrubs. Branchlets usually not flattened (arranged in several planes); ultimate shoots terete or 4-angled. Juvenile lvs needle-like, subulate, similar lvs often on main axes (terminal shoots). Adult lvs scale-like, opposite, decussate, often with a prominent, whitish resinous gland in middle of dorsal side. Cones solitary, terminal on short shoots towards branchlet ends. ♂ strobili (cones) oblong or ovoid, yellow; stamens numerous. Mature ♀ cones usually ± globose, usually > 10 mm diam., ripening in second year, generally persistent. Scales 6-14, not whorled, peltate with mucronate boss or umbo in middle, separating to release seeds; ovules and seeds 6-c. 20 on each scale. Seeds narrowly winged; cotyledons 3-4.
Taxonomic concepts
×Cupressocyparis
Cupressus L.
×Cuprocyparis Farjon
Cupressus L.
Xanthocyparis Farjon & Hiep
Cupressus L.
Xanthocyparis Farjon & Hiep
Collections
Notes
editorial
Adams et al. (2009) showed that Cupressusformed two clades: the Old World clade of Cupressuswas sister to Juniperus, whereas the New World clade of Cupressus (Hesperocyparis) included Xanthocyparis vietnamensis and Callitropsis nootkatensis. However, Mao et al. (2010) showed that Cupressus in its broad sense including Xanthocyparis and Callitropsis is monophyletic with weak support. Zhu et al. (2018) provided further evidence for the split of Cupressus into Cupressus, Callitropsis, Hesperocyparis and Xanthocyparis. Christenhusz et al. (2011) claim to be adopting a conservative position based on a poorly resolved tree. Zhu et al. (2018) moves us past that.
Metadata
cee344c5-80e8-4a9c-a7cb-ac89530def31
scientific name
Names_Plants
1 January 2000
13 February 2014