Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
Is NZ relevant
This is the current name
This record has collections
This record has descriptions
Threat status: Data deficient
Show more

Click to collapse Details Info

Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829

Click to collapse Biostatus Info

Recorded in error
New Zealand
Political Region
See G. sp. 'Mcleans' and G. sp. 'Cross Creek'

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Fr.
Fr.
1829
16
as 'Geaster saccatus'
Fr.
16
ICN
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
species
Geastrum saccatum

Click to collapse Classification Info

saccatum

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829

Plants superficial, ovate, pointed or umbonate, attached by a basal rhizomorph, becoming expanded when 2-3 cm. across. Exoperidium saccate, split to about the middle into 5-9 pliable, thin, expanded equal acute rays; fleshy layer brown, adnate, frequently rimose; exterior smooth, free from debris; base concave or plane, sometimes convex, with a prominent umbilical scar. Endoperidium sessile, to 15 mm. diameter, globose, glabrous, brown, partly enclosed by the saccate base of the exoperidium; peristome fibrillose, almost plane, concolorous or pallid, even, seated on a small depressed silky zone. Gleba umber; pseudo-columella indistinct. Spores globose, 3-3.5um diameter, epispore umber, 0.5um thick, finely and moderately verruculose. Opinions differ as to the characters of the species Fries named Geaster saccatus. I have followed modern European workers in considering it to be a plant with a fibrillose peristome, exoperidium externally free from debris, umbilical scar, and spores 3-3.5um diameter. Some workers have confused it with G.fimbriatum, others with G. triplex. Lloyd appeared to have had no clear conception as to the species; for some Australian collections named by him as G.saccatum proved to be G.triplex, G.australe and G.minus; one was correctly named, and a fifth, named by him as Geaster arenarius, I have placed under G.saccatum. His uncertainty apparently also confused Smith (1935) who found difficulty in separating the species from G.triplex, largely because he attempted delimitation on, the variable—and therefore unsuitable—feature of plant size.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum sensu G. Cunn.
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr. (1829)
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr.
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr.
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr. (1829)
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr. (1829)
Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
Geastrum saccatum Fr.

Click to collapse Collections Info

Geastrum saccatum Fr. 1829
[Not available]

Click to collapse Metadata Info

1cb18b14-36b9-11d5-9548-00d0592d548c
scientific name
Names_Fungi
8 February 2000
26 April 2023
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top