Lachnum brevipilosum Baral 1985
Details
Biostatus
Nomenclature
Classification
Synonyms
Associations
Descriptions
The description given is based entirely on the New Zealand collection, which had been previously determined as Dasyscyphus virgineus and reported under this name by Dennis (1961). It differs from that species in having smaller, more clavate spores, shorter and narrower paraphyses and fewer, comparatively shorter hairs. The apothecia do not have the appearance of being densely clothed with hairs and, when rehydrated, often appear virtually glabrous. A similar appearance is evidently typical of D. brevipila which, according to Le Gal (1939), has the appearance of a Helotium because of the short, scarcely visible hairs. British material under this name in K varies with regard to stipe length, but the species typically has a slender stipe. The published figure of 10-15 mm given for the diameter of the apothecia is, as noted by Dennis (1949), surely an error, probably by omission of the decimal point, as it was suggested by Le Gal that the species could be confused macroscopically with D. virginea or D. nivea. It, therefore, has smaller apothecia than the present collection, which also differs in having rather longer hairs. The spore shape agrees well with that illustrated by Le Gal, though the spores of the British Collection examined are slightly smaller.
It is possible that recognition of a variety of D. brevipila may eventually prove justified but, until further collections are available to confirm the differences noted here, such a proposal is premature.
Transfer of the epithet 'brevipila' to Lachnum is precluded under Article 64 of the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature as this would create a later homonym of L. brevipilum (Hõhnel) Nannfeldt.