Dibaeis fungoides (Sw.) Kalb & Gierl
Details
Dibaeis fungoides (Sw.) Kalb & Gierl in Gierl & Kalb, Herzogia 9: 622 (1993)
Dibaeis fungoides (Sw.) Kalb & Gierl
Biostatus
Absent
New Zealand
Political Region
The synonymy is unclear for this name is unclear.
Galloway (1985) accepted Baeomyces fungoides (Sw.) Ach. for new Zealand, but Galloway (2007) lists Baeomyces fungoides New Zealand records in a synonymy with Dibaeis arcuata. Baeomyces fungoides (Sw.) Ach. was misapplied.
A further complication is that IndexFungorum (April 2020) gives the current name for Bemyces fungoides as Dibaeis arcuata (Stirt.()Kalb & Gierl, which is in New Zealand.
An American synonymy placed Baeomyces fungoides in synonymy with
Dibaeis baeomyces (L. f.) Rambold & Hertel 1993 which was published twice in the year but, however, is invalid in one paper and lillegitimate in the other, according to Index Fungorum.
Nomenclature
(Sw.) Kalb & Gierl
Sw.
Kalb & Gierl
1993
622
ICN
species
Dibaeis fungoides
Classification
Descriptions
Thallus whitish or greyish-white, scurfy, ecorticate and in parts densely white-sorediate, soredia granular-floury, terricolous. Podetia simple, to 2 cm tall, pale, terete or compressed, surface rather scabrid, vertically furrowed, pale whitish-pink. Apothecia terminal, globose, capitate often convolute, pale flesh-pink to orange-pink, convex, immarginate, surface rather finely warted. Ascospores fusiform, simple, 12-30 × 2-4 µm. Chemistry: thallus and podetia K+ yellow, C-, KC-, Pd+ yellow-orange. Baeomycesic and squamatic acids (UV+ white).
Taxonomic concepts
Notes
editorial
Galloway (1985) accepted Baeomyces fungoides (Sw.) Ach. for new Zealand, but Galloway (2007) lists Baeomyces fungoides New Zealand records in a synonymy with Dibaeis arcuata. Baeomyces fungoides (Sw.) Ach. was misapplied.
A further complication is that IndexFungorum (April 2020) gives the current name for Bemyces fungoides as Dibaeis arcuata (Stirt.( Kalb & Gierl, which is in New Zealand.
An American synonymy placed Baeomyces fungoides in synonymy with
Dibaeis baeomyces (L. f.) Rambold & Hertel 1993 which was published twice in the year but, however, is invalid in one paper and lillegitimate in the other, according to Index Fungorum
Metadata
fc36baf3-7125-418f-8adc-0e1e56224a35
scientific name
Names_Plants
3 April 2020
3 April 2020