Lactarius turpis (Weinm.) Fr. 1838
Details
Biostatus
Nomenclature
Classification
Vernacular names
Associations
Descriptions
Lactarius turpis (Weinm.) Fr. 1838
There is some controversy over the correct name for this species and it is sometimes called Lactarius necator. The fungus described and illustrated by Bulliard (1791) as Agaricus necator was subsequently redescribed by Persoon (1801), and although Persoon referred to Bulliard's plate, there is little doubt that the fungus described by Persoon was not A. necator Bull. When the name was revalidated by Fries (1821), the description of A. necator agreed with that of Persoon but not with that of Bulliard. It appears that in revalidating A. necator. Fries misinterpreted the species. For this reason Bulliard's name has been rejected in favour of A. turpis Weinm. by most recent workers (Neuhoff, 1956; Dennis, et al. 1960). On the other hand. Singer (1962) considered that Fries misinterpreted Agaricus turpis Weinm. when he transferred the name in 1838, and cited the species as Lactarius necator (Bull. em. Pers. ex Fr.) Karst.
Lactarius turpis is an introduced species commonly associated with Betula pendula throughout the South Island, It is indigenous to temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere where it is typically associated with birches. The species is considered poisonous by European mycologists. Pilat (1961) stated that it is poisonous when raw or poorly cooked, but is edible although not recommended when the latex is soaked out. Lactarius turpis is readily recognisable by the large, stoutly stipitate, drab olive brown or brownish black frutifications, discoloured lamellae, and extremely acrid taste. The purple discolouration of the pileus with KOH and NH4OH is also characteristic. The species was placed in sect. Lactarius subsect. Vietini stirps Necator by Singer (1962).