Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Thambugala, Kasun M.; Hyde, Kevin D.; Tanaka, Kazuaki; Tian, Qing; Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N.; Ariyawansa, Hiran A.; Jayasiri, Subashini C.; Boonmee, Saranyaphat; Camporesi, Erio; Hashimoto, Akira; Hirayama, Kazuyuki; Schumacher, René K.; Promputtha, Itthayakorn; Liu, Zuo-Yi 2015: Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Lophiostomataceae, Floricolaceae, and Amorosiaceae fam. nov. Fungal Diversity 74(1): 199-266.

Reference record
Names_Fungi record source
Is NZ relevant
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Thambugala, Kasun M.; Hyde, Kevin D.; Tanaka, Kazuaki; Tian, Qing; Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N.; Ariyawansa, Hiran A.; Jayasiri, Subashini C.; Boonmee, Saranyaphat; Camporesi, Erio; Hashimoto, Akira; Hirayama, Kazuyuki; Schumacher, René K.; Promputtha, Itthayakorn; Liu, Zuo-Yi 2015: Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Lophiostomataceae, Floricolaceae, and Amorosiaceae fam. nov. Fungal Diversity 74(1): 199-266.
10.1007/s13225-015-0348-3
Article

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Species of Angustimassarina are considered as fungicolous. They may be parasitic on other fungi and appear to grow within other ascomata of other ascomycetes.
Notes: Trematosphaeria corticola was introduced by Fuckel (1870) and then Holm (1957) transferred this species to Massarina based on its morphology. Liewet al. (2002) transferred this species to Lophiostoma.This species is thought to be widely distributed andoccurs on various hosts including palms (Hyde andAptroot 1997). In our phylogenetic analysis a putativestrain ofM. corticola (CBS154.93) grouped in theAngustimassarina clade (E) and can be another species of Angustimassarina. However, recollection andepitypification are needed to confirm the placement.
Notes: Cesati and De Notaris (1863) transferred and accommodatedSphaeria compressa Pers. in LophiostomaLophiostomataceae) based on immersed to slightly erumpentcomata with a cylindrical papilla. Lophiostoma compressumwas transferred to several different genera, but Zhang et al.2009, 2011) placed L. compressum in Lophiostoma based onphylogenetic placement. Platystomum was introduced byevisan (1877) and is typified by Platystomum compressum(Pers.) Trevis. Platystomum compressum is listed as asynonym of Lophiostoma compressum (Pers.) Ces. & DeNot. in Index Fungorum (2015). However, Mugambi andHuhndorf (2009) showed in their combined phylogeneticanalysis, a putatively named strains of P. c omp re s s um groupedwith Pseudotrichia guatopoensis Huhndorf and Xenolophiumguianense Huhndorf in a separate clade fromLophiostomataceae, which may correspond to the familyPlatystomaceae (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009;Hydeetal.2013). However, in this phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1) thestrain (MFLUCC 13-0343) from new collection ofP. c o mp re s s u m grouped in Lophiostomataceae with othernew species of Platystomum (MFLUCC 14-0925, 15-0632,15-0633) and the putatively named strains of L. compressum(KT 521, JCM 13125 and IFRD 2014), Lophiostomatriseptatum Peck (SMH 5287 and SMH 2591) andLophiostoma viridarium Cooke (IFRDCC 2090) in a samesubclade (A1). We observed and illustrated the specimensattached to KT 521, JCM 13125 strains and the strains ofL. triseptatum and L. viridarium in GenBank are named withoutattached voucher material. Therefore, it is impractical toconfirm their characters. Re-collection, epitypification or areference specimen (Ariyawansa et al. 2014b) with moleculardata are essential for the type species of L. viridarium andL. triseptatum to establish their placement in Platystomum. We accept Platystomum in Lophiostomataceae as a distinctgenus and introduce four new species in Platystomum basedon new collections and two strains (KT 521 and JCM 13125).

Click to collapse Metadata Info

85a7bbb1-3865-4fa2-8a69-20530515505a
reference
Names_Fungi
3 June 2016
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top