Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
This is the current name
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart, FUSE 7 34 (2020)
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Aime & McTaggart
Aime & McTaggart
2020
34
ICN
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
genus
Araucariomyces

Click to collapse Classification Info

Araucariomyces

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020

Notes: Two rust fungi with cupulate aecia on Agathis spp., formerly placed in the form-genus Aecidium, belong here. Our analyses consistently place these in a lineage separate from all other sequenced Pucciniales (Fig. 1). Despite over a decade of sampling rust fungi from Australia and Southeast Asia on hosts co-distributed with Agathis species, we have been unable to locate a telial state for these rusts. Peterson (1968) ruled out the possibility that Araucariomyces represents an endocyclic form, because aeciospores of Ar. balansae germinate to produce germ tubes rather than basidia. As is conjectured with Rogerpetersonia, the life cycle may not produce a sporothallus, and instead has adapted to systemically infect their hosts possibly including a cryptic sexual or parasexual cycle.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart

Click to collapse Global name resources Info

Click to collapse Metadata Info

fc1a6151-89ea-496f-afaa-a3bdf95d5d4a
scientific name
Names_Fungi
1 June 2021
1 June 2021
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top