Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
Details
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart, FUSE 7 34 (2020)
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
Nomenclature
Aime & McTaggart
Aime & McTaggart
2020
34
ICN
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
genus
Araucariomyces
Classification
Subordinates
Descriptions
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
Notes: Two rust fungi with cupulate aecia on Agathis spp., formerly placed in the form-genus Aecidium, belong here. Our analyses consistently place these in a lineage separate from all other sequenced Pucciniales (Fig. 1). Despite over a decade of sampling rust fungi from Australia and Southeast Asia on hosts co-distributed with Agathis species, we have been unable to locate a telial state for these rusts. Peterson (1968) ruled out the possibility that Araucariomyces represents an endocyclic form, because aeciospores of Ar. balansae germinate to produce germ tubes rather than basidia. As is conjectured with Rogerpetersonia, the life cycle may not produce a sporothallus, and instead has adapted to systemically infect their hosts possibly including a cryptic sexual or parasexual cycle.
Taxonomic concepts
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart 2020
Araucariomyces Aime & McTaggart
Global name resources
Metadata
fc1a6151-89ea-496f-afaa-a3bdf95d5d4a
scientific name
Names_Fungi
1 June 2021
1 June 2021