Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson

Scientific name record
Names_Plants record source
Is NZ relevant
This is the current name
This record has collections
This is indigenous
Show more

Click to collapse Details Info

Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson in Wilson, Bot. Antarct. Voy. II (Fl. Nov.-Zel.) Part II, 68 (1854)
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson

Click to collapse Biostatus Info

Indigenous, non-endemic
Wild
New Zealand
Political Region

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Hook.f. & Wilson
Hook.f. & Wilson
1854
68
ICN
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
species
Campylopus pallidus
The species epithet pallidus is an obvious reference to the pale colour of the plants. The disused epithet torquatus makes reference to contorted leaves, presumably those of the often present reduced and propagula-like shoots.
Lectotype: N.Z., Northern Island, Auckland, Sinclair, BM 000517611! The Sinclair collection, one of two syntypes cited in the protologue is fertile and ample. Frahm (in herb. BM) has annotated this specimen “chosen as lectotype” with an illegible date (1981?). A published statement of this lectotypification cannot be located and in Frahm (1987) he stated that he had not seen type material.

Click to collapse Classification Info

pallidus

Click to collapse Associations Info

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Campylopus capillaceus sensu Fife
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus holomitrium sensu Sainsbury
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus lonchochaete Müll.Hal.
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus ohingaitii R.Br.bis
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus sparksii R.Br.bis
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
Campylopus torquatus Mitt.
Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson

Click to collapse Collections Info

Campylopus pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson
[Not available]

Click to collapse Notes Info

typification
Lectotype: N.Z., Northern Island, Auckland, Sinclair, BM 000517611! The Sinclair collection, one of two syntypes cited in the protologue is fertile and ample. Frahm (in herb. BM) has annotated this specimen “chosen as lectotype” with an illegible date (1981?). A published statement of this lectotypification cannot be located and in Frahm (1987) he stated that he had not seen type material.
Etymology
The species epithet pallidus is an obvious reference to the pale colour of the plants. The disused epithet torquatus makes reference to contorted leaves, presumably those of the often present reduced and propagula-like shoots.
editorial
"The evidence for applying the European name C. pyriformis (Schultz) Brid. [Bryol. Univ. 1: 471 (1826)] to N.Z. material is not convincing. The application of this name by several authors in Australasia dates from a brief publication by Corley & Frahm (1982). That publication outlined some confusion around the type of the basionym (Dicranum pyriforme Schultz) and confusingly stated that material described from the Azores as C. azoricus Mitt. “must be regarded as the typical form of C. pyriformis”. Corley & Frahm placed the Australasian C. pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson in the synonymy of C. pyriformis. The situation is rendered even more perplexing by their subsequent statement that the species in question is an Austral or Australasian species that may have been introduced to Europe in “pre-botanical” times. Subsequent publications, many authored by Frahm, have repeatedly cited the conclusions presented by Corley & Frahm (1982). Firmer evidence that Australasian material is conspecific with a European (Azorean?) species is required before the name C. pyriformis can be confidently applied to the N.Z. material. It is preferable to utilise the earliest Australasian name that can be typified for this widespread (in N.Z., Tasmania, and mainland Australia) and variable species. The name C. pallidus Hook.f. & Wilson is based on ample fruiting material from N.Z., and this name is applied here. The application of this name agrees with that favoured by Scott & Stone (1976), but is at odds with the use of C. torquatus Mitt. in Wilson by both Dixon (1923) and Sainsbury (1955a)."

Click to collapse Metadata Info

97a26918-0523-4e32-b9e8-01686098dd5e
scientific name
Names_Plants
1 January 2000
29 September 2017
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top