We value your privacy

We use cookies and other technologies to enhance your experience, analyse site usage, help with reporting, and assist in other ways to improve the website. You can choose to allow cookies and other technologies or decline. Your choice will not affect site functionality.

Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Bombardiaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
This is a synonym
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Bombardiaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde in Huang et al., Fungal Diversity 111 491 (2021)

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde
S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde
2021
491
ICN
family
Bombardiaceae

Click to collapse Classification Info

Bombardiaceae

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Bombardiaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021

the family Bombardiaceae was introduced by Huang et al. (2021), even though the ML bootstrap support was only 76% and there was no Bayesian inference support for this clade. Huang et al. (2021) explained that Marin-Felixet al. (2020) discussed the low support of this lineage, and for that reason no family was introduced to accommodate it. Nonetheless, they considered this lineage to be well- supported in their phylogenetic study, and therefore the new family Bombardiaceae was introduced to represent it. In our phylogenetic study (Fig. 2), which included the same se- quences that Huang et al. (2021) used, the clade representing this family is not supported (42% bs/0.89 pp), so we do not accept the Bombardiaceae as a justifiable family

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Bombardiaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021
Bombardiaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde

Click to collapse Global name resources Info

Click to collapse Metadata Info

8b51c2c7-c989-447b-84a8-105429b89335
scientific name
Names_Fungi
12 August 2022
30 October 2023
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top