Pectobacterium carnegieanum (Standring 1942) Brenner et al. 1973

Details

Name scientific

Pectobacterium carnegieanum (Standring 1942) Brenner et al. 1973, Int. J. Sys. Bact. 23

Preferred name

Pectobacterium carnegieanum (Standring 1942) Brenner et al. 1973

Taxonomy reference

BRENNER, D. J.; STEIGERWALT, A. G.; MIKLOS, G. V.; FANNING, G. R. 1973: Deoxyribonucleic Acid Relatedness Among Erwiniae and Other Enterobacteriaceae: The Soft-Rot Organisms (Genus Pectobacterium Waldee). International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 23(3): 205-216.

Biostatus

Origin

Occurrence

Georegion

Schema

Biostatus source

Comment

Exotic

Absent

New Zealand

Political Region

not a good species, see notes.

Nomenclature

Authors

(Standring) Brenner et al.

Original authors

Standring

Combination authors

Brenner et al.

Publication place

Orthography

as 'carnegieana'

Nomenclatural status

dubious name

Sanctioning reference

Skerman, V.B.D.; McGowan, V.; Sneath, P.H.A 1980: Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 30: 225-420.

Nomenclatural code

ICNP

Basionym

Erwinia carnegieana Standring 1942

Taxonomic rank

species

Canonical form

Pectobacterium carnegieanum

Classification

Kingdom

Bacteria

Phylum

Pseudomonadota

Class

Gammaproteobacteria

Order

Enterobacterales

Family

Pectobacteriaceae

Genus

Pectobacterium

Species

carnegieanum

Synonyms

Erwinia carnegieana Standring 1942

Descriptions

J.M. Young 2011: UNLIKELY PLANT PATHOGENIC BACTERIA. Journal of Plant Pathology 93(2): 247-250.

Erwinia carnegieana Standring 1942

Notes

The species was validly published. Because the type strain of P carnegiana (= E. carnegieana) was identified as a member of Klebsiella pneumoniae, a Request for an Opinion was made to reject this name (Alcorn and Orum, 1988). This was not supported because, in the absence of any identifiable strain to serve as the type strain, the name would naturally fall into disuse without the necessity of placing it on the List of Rejected Names (Wayne, 1994). Plainly it should not be recorded in a list of pathogenic species.