Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Zygospermellaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
This is a synonym
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Zygospermellaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde in Huang et al., Fungal Diversity 111 527 (2021)

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde
S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde
2021
527
ICN
family
Zygospermellaceae

Click to collapse Classification Info

Zygospermellaceae

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Zygospermellaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021

The families Lasiosphaeridaceae and Zygospermellaceae, erected for only one and two genera, respectively, are also points of contention since they were proposed based on limited taxon sampling and poor taxonomic practices. In the recent phylogenetic studies from Kruys et al. (2015) and Marin-Felix et al. (2020), both clades now considered inde- pendent families by Huang et al. (2021) were clustering to- gether in a well-supported clade. Huang et al. (2021) prema- turely introduced both families since they formed two inde- pendent lineages in their phylogenetic study. However, both families are included in the Schizotheciaceae clade in our Bayesian phylogenetic study (0.97 pp) (Fig. 2). More taxa and sequences should be incorporated in further phylogenetic analyses to verify if the Lasiosphaeridaceae and Zygospermellaceae are two independent lineages or belong to the Schizotheciaceae. For these reasons, we reject these families until more data can be analysed and we refer to both lineages as Lasiosphaeriaceae s. lato.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Zygospermellaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde 2021
Zygospermellaceae S.K. Huang, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde

Click to collapse Metadata Info

4889ca90-ca95-4a5a-bbf9-7bfe99e8b110
scientific name
Names_Fungi
12 August 2022
12 August 2022
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top