Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr. 1964

Scientific name record
Names_Fungi record source
This is a synonym
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr., Canad. J. Bot. 42 528 (1964)

Click to collapse Nomenclature Info

Rob.-Jeffr.
Rob.-Jeffr.
1964
528
invalidly published
ICN
Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr. 1964
species
Verticicladiella huntii

Click to collapse Classification Info

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr. 1964

Verticicladiella huntii was not described in Robinson-Jeffrey's 1964 manuscript, in this publication Ceratocystis huntii is explicitly described, but the anamorph is only alluded to such as “Conidiophores of the Leptographium type, with sporogenous cells frequently bearing two or three sympodioconidia as is characteristic of the genus Verticicladiella” in fact the author states: “Imperfect states ... are too generalized to be of much diagnostic value.”. This error arose from Wingfield's 1985 paper (pg. 92) in which he used Verticicladiella huntii as the basionym for the combination Leptographium huntii. The journal volume was also erroneous given as 40 rather than 42.

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr. 1964
Verticicladiella huntii Rob.-Jeffr.

Click to collapse Notes Info

taxonomic status
Verticicladiella huntii was not described in Robinson-Jeffrey's 1964 manuscript, in this publication Ceratocystis huntii is explicitly described, but the anamorph is only alluded to such as “Conidiophores of the Leptographium type, with sporogenous cells frequently bearing two or three sympodioconidia as is characteristic of the genus Verticicladiella” in fact the author states: “Imperfect states ... are too generalized to be of much diagnostic value.”. This error arose from Wingfield's 1985 paper (pg. 92) in which he used Verticicladiella huntii as the basionym for the combination Leptographium huntii. The journal volume was also erroneous given as 40 rather than 42.

Click to collapse Metadata Info

0d5b353a-e197-4813-9806-4982de955956
scientific name
Names_Fungi
14 May 2024
30 May 2024
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top