Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Quijada L, Matočec N, Kušan I, Tanney JB, Johnston PR, Mešić A, Pfister DH 2022: Apothecial Ancestry, Evolution, and Re-Evolution in Thelebolales (Leotiomycetes, Fungi). Biology 11(4): 583 [1 of 28].

Reference record
Names_Fungi record source
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Quijada L, Matočec N, Kušan I, Tanney JB, Johnston PR, Mešić A, Pfister DH 2022: Apothecial Ancestry, Evolution, and Re-Evolution in Thelebolales (Leotiomycetes, Fungi). Biology 11(4): 583 [1 of 28].
10.3390/biology11040583
Article

Click to collapse Taxonomic concepts Info

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

Diagnosis: Phylogenetically isolated within Thelebolales. Ascomata open; outer layer of the excipulum with globose to angular cells; capitate paraphyses with intra- or extracellular pigments and asci with forcible spore discharge augmented by an opening limitation ring-type apical apparatus; ascospores hyaline, smooth, or ornamented; either aseptate and ellipsoid-ovoid-fusoid, not producing conidia, or with more than ten septa, acicular-cylindrical-fusiform-acicular, and producing conidia. Ramgea differs from apothecioid members of Thelebolaceae by ornamented ascospores and paraphyses with capitate tips bearing granular, firmly cemented pigment exudates. Patinella and Holwaya differ from Tympanis and Durandiella (Tympanidaceae) and Aotearoamyces and Bulgaria (Phacidiaceae) in excipular composition of mostly globose-angular cells in combination with non-amyloid asci and ascospores.

Click to collapse Metadata Info

4c926aa5-216b-41e6-9611-4b7ed48776f6
reference
Names_Fungi
12 April 2022
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top