Download Copy a link to this page Cite this record

Chen, C.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Sun, G.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. 2016: Redefining common endophytes and plant pathogens in Neofabraea, Pezicula, and related genera. Fungal Biology 120(11): 1291-1322.

Reference record
Names_Fungi record source
Is NZ relevant
This record has descriptions

Click to collapse Details Info

Chen, C.; Verkley, G.J.M.; Sun, G.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. 2016: Redefining common endophytes and plant pathogens in Neofabraea, Pezicula, and related genera. Fungal Biology 120(11): 1291-1322.
10.1016/j.funbio.2015.09.013
Article

Click to collapse Descriptions Info

We can readily distinguish Neofabraea from Phlyctema based on their asexual morphs. Phlyctema species have eustromatic conidiomata, fusiform macroconidia, and filiform microconidia, while all the known Neofabraea species form acervular conidiomata, macroconidia that vary in shape (cylindrical-fusiform, allantoid to ellipsoid), and shorter microconidia.
Neofabraea was protected over Phlyctema ( Johnston et al. 2014), because the type species, Ph. vagabunda, was considered a member of Neofabraea, making Phlyctema a synonym of Neofabraea. However, the present study proved that these two genera are not taxonomically congruent (see below); therefore, Phlyctema and Neofabraea are accepted as distinct genera.

Click to collapse Metadata Info

252a9eda-74e8-4293-ba6e-fc385a9f4297
reference
Names_Fungi
15 August 2016
20 April 2017
Click to go back to the top of the page
Top